Survey insight / 2026.06.02 Survey insight / Jun 2, 2026

高評価の理由は、抜歯ケースの「歯根管理」が具体化したこと。 The high rating came from making root control in extraction cases feel actionable.

参加者は Sandra Tai 先生の臨床哲学だけでなく、フロッグ法、ゲーブルベンド、10度トルク補正、バーチャルIPRを「明日から試す設計」に変換して受け取っています。 Participants did not just appreciate Dr. Sandra Tai's clinical philosophy. They translated frog staging, gable bends, 10-degree torque overcorrection, and virtual IPR into immediate clinical actions.

4.56 / 5 全体満足度。5点評価が11/16。 Overall satisfaction. 11 of 16 rated it 5.
+81 NPS。推奨者14、批判者1。 NPS. 14 promoters and 1 detractor.
Premolar extraction biomechanics Premolar extraction biomechanics

Conclusion

次回以降は、アタッチメント設計と抜歯応用を深掘りすると熱量が続く。 Future sessions should deepen attachment biomechanics and extraction-case applications.

集計対象は実回答16件。明らかなテスト回答1件は除外。メールアドレスはHTMLには表示していません。 The analysis uses 16 real responses. One obvious test row was excluded. Email addresses are not displayed in this HTML.

Responses Responses 16

回答規模は小さいが、臨床家の関心領域はかなり明瞭。 The sample is small, but the clinical demand is unusually clear.

Satisfaction Satisfaction 4.56

5点が11件、4点が3件、3点が2件。 11 ratings of 5, 3 ratings of 4, and 2 ratings of 3.

Difficulty fit Difficulty fit 3.06

難易度は中央に集中。専門的だが追える設計。 Difficulty clustered near the middle: specialized, but followable.

Quote permission Quote permission 11

実名可5、匿名可6、引用不可5。 5 real-name approvals, 6 anonymous approvals, 5 not approved.

Evidence

刺さったのは「動かし方」。聞きたいのは「設計の再現性」。 What resonated was movement strategy. What they want next is design reproducibility.

上位テーマは、感想・質問の内容とも一致しています。単発の満足ではなく、次の臨床疑問が生まれています。 The top themes match the free-text comments and questions. The session created follow-up clinical questions, not just satisfaction.

最も印象に残ったテーマ Most memorable themes

n=16
ステージング理論（フロッグ法・レシプロカル法）Staging theory: frog / reciprocal methods
9
ゲーブルベンド・歯根管理Gable bends and root control
8
切歯トルク補正（10度過剰修正）Incisor torque overcorrection by 10 degrees
7
Sandra Tai先生の臨床哲学Dr. Tai's clinical philosophy
6
バーチャルIPR / 空隙閉鎖の設計Virtual IPR and space-closure design
5

評価が高い理由は、結論より「設計判断」が見えたこと。 The value was not only the answers. It was seeing the design decisions.

参加者のコメントは、ClinCheck、オーバーコレクション、技工指示、再スキャン、骨格差への応用へ広がっています。 Comments move into ClinCheck setup, overcorrection, technician communication, rescans, and skeletal-pattern adaptation.

Technique Technique

フロッグ法、ゲーブルベンド、トルク補正。Frog staging, gable bends, torque correction.

Judgment Judgment

どのケースで、どの量を、どこまで入れるか。Which cases, how much, and how far to prescribe.

Transfer Transfer

明日のClinCheckに移せる具体性。Specific enough to transfer into tomorrow's ClinCheck.

Testimonials

公開OKの感想は、アーカイブ掲載前にStripe照合で氏名・肩書を確定する。 Consented testimonials should be matched with Stripe records before archive publication.

ここではメールアドレス・氏名は出さず、引用許可と専門領域だけで下書き表示しています。 This draft does not expose email addresses or names. It shows only consent category and professional context.

「最適アタッチメントを見直してみようと思いました。」 "It made me want to revisit the optimal attachment design."
Stripe照合待ち / 矯正専門フリーランス Stripe match pending / Freelance orthodontic specialist 実名可Real-name OK
「抜歯症例において、ゲーブルベンドを反映した設定でClinCheckを作成し、早速臨床に取り入れてみました。」 "For an extraction case, I created a ClinCheck setup reflecting gable bends and have already started using it clinically."
Stripe照合待ち / 矯正専門開業医 Stripe match pending / Orthodontic practice owner 実名可Real-name OK
「抜歯症例での小臼歯部へのオーバーコレクション、デンタルモニタリングの活用、バーチャルIPRを試したい。」 "I want to try premolar-region overcorrection in extraction cases, DentalMonitoring, and virtual IPR."
Stripe照合待ち / 矯正フリーランス Stripe match pending / Freelance orthodontic clinician 実名可Real-name OK
「前歯トルク補正10度、臼歯部15度を臨床で意識したい。」 "I want to apply 10 degrees of anterior torque correction and 15 degrees in the molar region clinically."
Stripe照合待ち / 勤務医 Stripe match pending / Associate dentist 実名可Real-name OK
「トルクを入れての変化を検討したい。」 "I would like to evaluate the changes created by adding torque."
匿名 / 歯周病領域 Anonymous / Periodontology background 匿名可Anonymous OK
「Case 1と2で上顎大臼歯のloss量が全く違う点について考察を聞きたいです。」 "I would like to hear discussion on why the amount of upper-molar loss differed so much between Case 1 and Case 2."
匿名 / 矯正フリーランス Anonymous / Freelance orthodontic clinician 匿名可Anonymous OK

Archive operation

公開は「回答同意 → Stripe照合 → 翻訳確認 → 掲載」の4段階で安全に進める。 Publish through four safe steps: consent, Stripe matching, translation review, and archive placement.

Stripeから取得した個人情報は、表示名・肩書の確認用途に限定。メール・決済IDは公開しません。 Stripe personal data should be used only to verify display names and titles. Emails and payment IDs should never be published.

01

引用許可で分けるSeparate by quote permission

実名可、匿名可、引用不可を分離。引用不可はアーカイブ掲載しない。Separate real-name, anonymous, and non-quotable responses. Never publish non-quotable comments.

02

Stripeで本人情報を照合Match identity through Stripe

回答メールとStripe customer / receiptの情報を照合し、公開名と肩書だけを候補化。Match survey email with Stripe customer or receipt data, then extract only candidate display name and title.

03

日英翻訳を確認Review Japanese and English text

臨床用語、ニュアンス、匿名性を確認。必要なら掲載前に本人確認。Check clinical terminology, nuance, and anonymity. Confirm with the respondent before publishing when needed.

04

アーカイブへ掲載Publish to the archive

セミナーページに感想として追加。言語切替で日本語・英語の両方を表示。Add testimonials to the seminar archive and expose both Japanese and English through language switching.

Message draft

Sandra Tai先生には、送金完了・高評価・今後の関心を短く温かく伝える。 Tell Dr. Tai warmly and briefly: payment completed, feedback was excellent, and future interest is clear.

特定の回数番号ではなく、future sessions / future topics としてまとめています。 This frames the requests as future-session interests rather than a numbered episode.

要点 Key points

USD 2,000の振込完了を伝え、着金確認を依頼。アンケートは満足度4.56/5、NPS +81と非常に高評価。次回以降に聞きたい内容は、アタッチメント設計、抜歯応用、大臼歯遠心移動、保定、開咬戦略。 Mention the completed USD 2,000 transfer and ask her to confirm receipt. The survey was excellent: 4.56/5 satisfaction and +81 NPS. Future interests include attachment design, extraction applications, molar distalization, retention, and open-bite strategy.

Draft to Dr. Sandra Tai 
Dear Dr. Tai,

Thank you again for your wonderful lecture for Aligner Radio.

I have completed the USD 2,000 transfer for your honorarium. Could you please confirm once it arrives on your side?

The post-seminar survey results were excellent. The average satisfaction score was 4.56 out of 5, and the NPS was +81. Many participants specifically mentioned frog staging, gable bends, root control, 10-degree torque overcorrection, virtual IPR, and your clinical philosophy as the most valuable parts of the session.

Several doctors also wrote that they would like to apply these ideas immediately in their own ClinCheck setups and extraction cases. We are very grateful for how practical and clinically meaningful your lecture was.

For future sessions, the topics with the strongest interest were attachment design and biomechanics, advanced extraction-case applications, molar distalization / Class II treatment, retention and relapse prevention, and aligner strategy for open-bite cases.

Thank you again for sharing your insight so generously with our community.

Warm regards,
Takao
Aligner Radio archive Survey form Response sheet